Humanized care in high-risk prenatal care: nurses’ perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202144521Keywords:
Pregnancy, High-Risk; Obstetric Nursing; Prenatal Care; Qualitative Research.Abstract
Objective: to unveil nurses’ perceptions about humanized care in high-risk prenatal care. Methods: a qualitative study, with six nurses who worked in high-risk prenatal care. Data collection took place using semi-structured interviews. To analyze the results, the content analysis technique was used. Results: the adoption of humanized care consisted of actions related to user embracement, personalized care, dialogue with pregnant women and the establishment of a trustful relationship. The main humanization practices were guided visits to maternity hospitals; creating educational groups; the use of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief during labor; and encouraging companion support. Conclusion: participating nurses understood the humanization concept and associated humanization practices to the embracement of pregnant women, guided visits, personalized care, guidance on the use of non-pharmacological methods and the promotion of connections with pregnant women.
References
Garcia EM, Martinelli KG, Gama SGN, Oliveira AE, Esposti CDD, Santos Neto ET. Gestational risk and social inequalities: a possible relationship? Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2019; 24(12):4633-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182412.31422017
Ferreira Junior AR, Oliveira Filho JT, Albuquerque RAS, Siqueira DD, Rocha FA, Rodrigues MESG. O enfermeiro no pré-natal de alto risco: papel profissional. Rev Baiana Saúde Pública. 2017; 41(3):650-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.22278/2318-2660.2017.v41.n3.a2524
Holness N. High-risk pregnancy. Nurs Clin North Am. 2018; 53(2):241-51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2018.01.010
Rodrigues ARM, Rodrigues DP, Viana AB, Cabral LS, Silveira MAM. Nursing care in high-risk pregnancies: an integrative review. Online Braz J Nurs. 2016; 15(3):472-83. doi: http://www.objnursing.uff.br/index.php/nursing/article/view/5434
Phillippi JC, Holley SL, Payne K, Schorn MN, Karp SM. Facilitators of prenatal care in an exemplar urban clinic. Women Birth. 2016; 29(2):160-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.09.007
Karabulut Ö, Potur DC, Merih YD, Mutlu SC, Demirci N. Does antenatal education reduce fear of childbirth? Int Nurs Rev. 2016; 63(1):60-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12223
Heaman MI, Sword W, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Helewa ME, Morris H, et al. Barriers and facilitators related to use of prenatal care by inner-city women: perceptions of health care providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15(2):1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0431-5
Mendes RB, Santos JMJ, Prado DS, Gurgel RQ, Bezerra FD, Gurgel RQ. Evaluation of the quality of prenatal care based on the recommendations Prenatal and Birth Humanization Program. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2020; 25(3):793-804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020253.13182018
Jorge HMF, Makuch MY. Nursing training and practice on humanization actions in monitoring the delivery in Brazil. Int Arch Med. 2016; 9(212):1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3823/2083
Maternidade-Escola Assis Chateabriand. Missão, visão e valores [Internet]. 2015 [cited Feb 10, 2020]. Availabe from: http://www2.ebserh.gov.br/web/meac-ufc/missao-visao-e-valores
Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 2016.
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Humanização do parto: humanização no pré-natal e nascimento [Internet]. 2002 [cited Apr 13, 2020]. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/parto.pdf
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria nº 1.459 de 24 de junho de 2011. Institui, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), a Rede Cegonha [Internet]. 2011 [cited Apr 13, 2020]. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2011/prt1459_24_06_2011.html
Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70; 2016.
Gilmer C, Buchan JL, Letourneau N, Bennett CT, Shanker SG, Fenwick A, et al. Parent education interventions designed to support the transition to parenthood: a realist review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016; 59:118-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.015
Barreto CN, Wilhelm LA, Silva SCD, Alves CN, Cremonese L, Ressel LB. The Unified Health System that works: actions of humanization of prenatal care. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2015; 36(spe):168-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2015.esp.56769
Silva AA, Jardim MJA, Rios CTF, Fonseca LMB, Coimbra LC. Prenatal care of habitual- risk pregnant women: potentialities and weaknesses. Rev Enferm UFSM. 2019; 9(15):1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769232336
Chen J, Huang J, Ooi S, Lin L, Chen C, Liu YS, et al. Effect of flexible patterns of health education on enhancing the compliance of pregnant women from Tibet, China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(1):e18447. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018447
Villamil L, Mercedes M, Botero A, Pilar M, Guzmán C, Inés C. Humanized pregnancy care: the look of pregnant women who go to a hospital health unit. Enferm Actual Costa Rica. 2020; (38):180-95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revenf.v0i38.38376
Gadelha IP, Diniz FF, Aquino PS, Silva DM, Balsells MMD, Pinheiro AKB. Social determinants of health of high-risk pregnant women during prenatal follow-up. Rev Rene. 2020; 21:e42198. doi: https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20202142198
