Comparison of physical activity and sedentary behavior levels in secondary and university students

Keywords: Exercise; Sedentary Behavior; Students; Young Adult; South Africa.

Abstract

Objective: to compare physical activity and sedentary behavior in university students and secondary students. Methods: the cross-sectional study involved 202 selected secondary students and 171 university students. The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire was administered to the respondents. Percentages, chi-square test, Mann Whitney U test and linear regression were used for data analysis. Results: about 63% and 32% of secondary and university students, respectively, reported high levels of physical activity, while 84.7% and 71.9% of secondary and undergraduate students, respectively, met guidelines for sedentary behavior. The secondary students had significantly higher scores than the university students in vigorous (p=0.004), moderate (p<0.001), and total physical activity (p<0.001). The observed difference was more prominent among females. Conclusion: secondary students had higher scores of physical activity and spent less time in sedentary behavior.


References

World Health Organization (WHO). Physical activity [Internet]. 2020 [cited May 6, 2021]. Available from: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity

Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN). What is Sedentary Behaviour? [Internet]. 2020 [cited May 6, 2021]. Available from: https://www.sedentarybehaviour.org/what-is-sedentary-behaviour/

Ku PW, Steptoe A, Liao Y, Hsueh MC, Chen LJ. A cut-off of daily sedentary time and all-cause mortality in adults: a meta-regression analysis involving more than 1 million participants. BMC Med. 2018; 16(1):74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1062-2

Winpenny EM, Smith M, Penney T, Foubister C, Guagliano JM, Love R, et al. Changes in physical activity, diet, and body weight across the education and employment transitions of early adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2020; 21(4):e12962. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12962

Corder K, Winpenny E, Love R, Brown HE, White M, Sluijs EV. Change in physical activity from adolescence to early adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. 2019; 53(8):496-503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097330

Prioreschi A, Brage S, Westgate K, Norris SA, Micklesfield LK. Cardiorespiratory fitness levels and associations with physical activity and body composition in young South African adults from Soweto. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(301). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4212-0

Arlinghaus KR, Johnston CA. Advocating for behavior change with education. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2017; 12(2):113-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827617745479

Uys M, Bassett S, Draper CE, Micklesfield L, Monyeki A, Villiers A, et al. Results from South Africa’s 2016 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health. 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0409

Keating XD, Zhou K, Liu X, Hodges M, Liu J, Guan J, Phelps A, Castro-Piñero J. Reliability and concurrent validity of global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16(21):4128. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214128

Kgokong D, Parker R. Physical activity in physiotherapy students: levels of physical activity and perceived benefits and barriers to exercise. S Afr J Physiother. 2020; 76(1):a1399. doi: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v76i1.1399

Telford RM, Telford RD, Cochrane T, Cunningham RB, Olive LS, Davey R. The influence of sport club participation on physical activity, fitness and body fat during childhood and adolescence: the LOOK Longitudinal Study. J Sci Med Sport. 2016; 19(5):400-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2015.04.008

Law A, Hollar L, Sklar EM, Sprague P. Physical activity of osteopathic medical students. J Phys Act Health. 2018; 2(1):45-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.16

Oyeyemi AL, Muhammed S, Oyeyemi AY, Adegoke BOA. Patterns of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time: are Nigerian health professional students complying with public health guidelines? PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0190124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190124

Franco DC, Ferraz NL, Sousa TF. Sedentary behavior among university students: a systematic review. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2019; 21:e56485. doi: https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2019v21e56485

Bauman AE, Petersen CB, Blond K, Rangul V, Hardy LL. The descriptive epidemiology of sedentary behaviour. In: Leitzmann MF, Jochem C, Schmid D. Sedentary behaviour epidemiology. Cham: Springer International; 2018. p.73-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61552-3_4

Zhou Y, Wang L. Correlates of physical activity of students in secondary school physical education: a systematic review of literature. Bio Med Res Int. 2019; 2019:4563484. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/

Carballo-Fazanes A, Rico-Díaz J, Barcala-Furelos R, Rey E, Rodríguez-Fernández JE, Varela-Casal C, et al. Physical activity habits and determinants, sedentary behaviour and lifestyle in university students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9):3272. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093272

Published
2022-01-05
How to Cite
Naidoo, N., Olagbegi, O. M., Nadasan, T., & Afolabi, J. O. (2022). Comparison of physical activity and sedentary behavior levels in secondary and university students. Rev Rene, 23, e71433. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222371433
Section
Research Article