Conceptual plausibility and the rationality of theistic belief
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36517/arf.v17i1.94847Keywords:
Conceptual plausibility. Inductive plausibility. Explanatory fruitfulness. Concept of God.Abstract
In this article, I present a defence of conceptual plausibility, understood as an epistemic way to qualify concepts that situates them between the merely possible and the actual. To show that there is such a thing as conceptual plausibility, I rely on what seems to lie at the heart of many uses of the phrase ‘plausible concept’: explanatory fruitfulness. To make an effective case for the claim that conceptual plausibility is of philosophical interest, I present an argument based on the debate over the rationality of theistic belief and the concept of God. To show that conceptual plausibility is philosophically feasible, I first show that it cannot be reduced to propositional plausibility. Next, I offer a minimally precise characterization of conceptual plausibility; I approach this from a qualitative and comparative perspective as well. Finally, I show how these qualitative and comparative criteria of conceptual plausibility might be applied to the debate over the rationality of theistic belief and the concept of God.
Downloads
References
AVENA, N. M.; RADA, P.; HOEBEL, B. B. Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, n. 32, p. 20-39, 2008.
BOUDREAUX, D.; CRAMPTON, E. Truth and Consequences: Some Economics of False Consciousness. The Independent Review, n. 8, p. 27-45, 2008.
CARNAP, R. Logical foundations of probability. 2. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
CARNAP, R. Remarks on induction and truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, n. 6, p. 590-602, 1946.
EDWARDS, S. Three concepts of suffering. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, n. 6, p. 59-66, n. 2003.
GÖCKE, B. Concepts of God and models of the God-world relation. Philosophy Compass, n. 12, 2017.
HABERMAS, J.; REHG, W. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.
IVANI, S. What we (should) talk about when we talk about fruitfulness. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, n. 9, p. 3-18, 2019.
KING, J. Structured propositions. In: ZALTA, E. N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2019. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/propositions-structured/.
KOCH, S. Carnapian explications, experimental philosophy and fruitful concepts. Inquiry, n. 62, p. 700-717, 2019.
KUHN, T. Objectivity, value judgement, and theory choice. In: The Essential Tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977. p. 320-339.
LARSON, G. Hindu theology: materialism, dualism and the philosophy of yoga. International Journal of Hindu Studies, n. 17, p. 181-219, 2013.
MARGOLIS, E.; LAURENCE, S. Concepts. In: ZALTA, E. N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/concepts/.
MURPHY, G. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
OWEN, H. Concepts of Deity. London: Macmillan, 1971.
POST, J. Infinite regresses of justification and of explanation. Philosophical Studies, n. 38, p. 31-52, 1980.
QUINN, P. Value and the good life. Faith and Philosophy, n. 19, p. 385-390, 2002.
RUSSELL, B. Principles of mathematics. 2. ed. New York: Norton, 1903.
SCHLECKER, M. The architectures of planetary systems: population synthesis meets observations. Doctoral Dissertation. Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, 2021.
SHULTS, F. Religious family systems. Theology after the birth of God. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. p. 113-147.
SILVESTRE, R. Inductive plausibility and certainty. In: TREPCZYNSKI, M. (Ed.). Philosophical approaches to the foundations of Logics and Mathematics. Leiden: Brill, 2021. p. 194-210.
SLATER, M. Ethical naturalism and religious belief in “The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life”. William James Studies, n. 2, p. 1-47, 2007.
SWINBURNE, R. Is there a God? Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
SWINBURNE, R. The existence of God. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
WEISS, F. Food and addiction: a comprehensive handbook. Book Review. American Journal of Psychotherapy, n. 67, p. 302-307, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ricardo Silvestre
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Argumentos magazine is licensed under an International Creative Commons Attribution License.
The Magazine uses CC BY inclusion
1) The authors retain the copyright granted to the magazine or the right to initial publication, with the work regularly licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
2) The authors are authorized to contract additional applicable contracts, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in the institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encourage to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as they can generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and reference of published work.
.jpg)
._._3.png)
1.jpg)
._._._.png)
