Social immersion, spatial bricolage and entrepreneurship in the context of traditional communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2023.83320Keywords:
social immersion, traditional communities, entrepreneurship, spatial bricolage, local cultureAbstract
Entrepreneurship can be a way to improve life in traditional communities by seeking to harness the potential of the local culture. Social immersion helps learn the dynamics of entrepreneurship in community contexts by contributing to the understanding of the logic of embeddedness, identifying opportunities for collective actions through spatial bricolage. Thus, in the traditional community context, spatial bricolage shows possibilities for joint actions by the population that are in line with customs and traditions. This essay discusses elements of spatial bricolage in the context of social immersion in entrepreneurship in traditional communities considering embeddedness as an element of spatial bricolage by understanding that local potential can only be seized by members aligned with the local culture.
References
Almeida, A. W. B., & Farias Júnior, E. A. (2013). Povos e comunidades tradicionais: Nova cartografia social. U. Edições.
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2014). Entrepreneurial Opportunities and Poverty Alleviation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(1), 159-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12078
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barretto Filho, H. T. (2006). Populações tradicionais: Introdução à crítica da ecologia política de uma noção. Sociedades Caboclas Amazônicas: Modernidade e Invisibilidade, 109-144.
Bouças da Silva, D. L., Hoffmann, V. E., & Costa, H. A. (2020). Confiança em redes de cooperação do turismo: Análise de seu papel e elementos vinculados em Parnaíba, Piauí, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, 14(2), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v14i2.1535
Bovo, C. R. M. (2014). A contribuição da teoria da rede social de Mark Granovetter para a compreensão do funcionamento dos mercados e a atuação das empresas. Pensamento & Realidade, 29(3).
Brandemburg, A. (2010). Do rural tradicional ao rural socioambiental. Ambiente & Sociedade, 13(2), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-753x2010000200013
Brandt, M., & Nodari, E. S. (2011). Comunidades tradicionais da Floresta de Araucária de Santa Catarina: Territorialidade e memória. Historia Unisinos, 15(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.4013/htu.2011.151.09
Cárdenas, L., Lopes, F., & Baldi, M. (2011). Arranjos cooperativos sob a ótica da imersão social e da economia dos custos de transação: Um estudo de caso. Base – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 8(3), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2011.83.01
Carvalho, A. V., & Macedo, J. P. (2018). Povos e comunidades tradicionais: Revisão sistemática da produção de conhecimento em Psicologia. Psicologia - Teoria e Prática, 20(3), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.5935/1980-6906/psicologia.v20n3p198-215
Carvalho, P. A. H. V, & Cohen, M. (2019). Empreendedorismo sustentável enquanto empreendedorismo institucional: Estratégias de mobilização e de legitimação para a mudança. Revista Pretexto, 20(2), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.21714/pretexto.v20i2.6935
Castro, R. R. A., & Oliveira, M. C. C. (2016). Os termos “populações” e “comunidades” tradicionais e a apropriação dos conceitos no contexto amazônico. Mundo Amazónico, 7(1-2). https://doi.org/10.15446/ma.v7.55919
Corrêa, V. S., Vale, G. M. V., Melo, P. L. R., & Cruz, M. A. (2020). O “Problema da Imersão” nos Estudos do Empreendedorismo: Uma Proposição Teórica. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 24(3), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2020190096.
Costa, P. D. A., Seifert, R. E., Meira, F. B., & Hocayen-da-silva, A. J. (2018). Provocações epistemológicas, teóricas e metodológicas a partir de experiências empíricas de organizações alternativas e contra hegemônicas. Farol – Revista de Estudos Organizacionais e Sociedade, 5 (13), 477-495.
Cunha, M. C. (2007). Relações e dissensões entre saberes tradicionais e saber científico. Revista USP, 75, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i75p76-84
Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002
Davidsson, P., Baker, T., & Senyard, J. M. (2017). A measure of entrepreneurial bricolage behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 23(1), 114-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0256
Desa, G. (2012). Resource Mobilization in International Social Entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a Mechanism of Institutional Transformation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(4), 727-751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x
Domenico, M. L., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x
Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C. C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347051
Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1287-1303.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic Institutions as Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis. Acta Sociologica, 35(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939203500101
Hanazaki, N., Zank, S., Fonseca-Kruel, V. S., & Schmidt, I. B. (2018). Indigenous and traditional knowledge, sustainable harvest, and the long road ahead to reach the 2020 global strategy for plant conservation objectives. Rodriguesia, 69(4), 1587-1601. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201869409
Hocayen-da-Silva, A., Vizeu, F., & Seifert, R. E. (2016). Formas não convencionais de organização na América Latina: Reflexões acerca do discurso de desenvolvimento no modo de vida dos faxinais. Farol - Revista de Estudos Organizacionais e Sociedade, 3(8), 1156-1253.
Hocayen-da-Silva, A. J. (2015). Formas não convencionais de Organização: Reflexões a partir das Comunidades Tradicionais de Faxinais. U. Positivo.
Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3
Johnson, A. G. (1997). The Blackwell dictionary of sociology (a user’s guide to sociological language). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Klerk, S. (2015). The creative industries: An entrepreneurial bricolage perspective. Management Decision, 53(4), 828-842. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2014-0169
Korsgaard, S., Anderson, A., & Gaddefors, J. (2016). Entrepreneurship as re-sourcing. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 10(2), 178-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-03-2014-0002
Korsgaard, S., Ferguson, R., & Gaddefors, J. (2015). The best of both worlds: How rural entrepreneurs use placial embeddedness and strategic networks to create opportunities. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 27(9-10), 574-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1085100
Korsgaard, S., Müller, S., & Welter, F. (2021). It’s right nearby: How entrepreneurs use spatial bricolage to overcome resource constraints. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 33(1-2), 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2020.1855479
Larsen, J. S. K., Lauvås, T., & Sørheim, R. (2022). In the same boat? The dynamics of embedded firms in peripheral regions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 34(3-4), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2055151
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1989). Pensamento Selvagem. In T. Pelegrini (Ed.), O Pensamento Selvagem (1st ed.). Papirus.
Lopes, J., Ferreira, J., & Farinha, L. (2021). Entrepreneurship and the resource-based view: What is the linkage? A bibliometric approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2021.114408
Machado, H. P. V. (2020). Bricolagem na criação e trajetória de um circo contemporâneo. Organizações & Sociedade, 27(93), 314-332. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9270938
Maciel, C. O., Taffarel, M., & Camargo, C. (2014). Embeddedness estrutural e espacial em redes estratégicas: Efeitos atitudinais no nível das díades. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 15(3), 166-190. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712014/administracao.v15n3p166-190
McKague, K., & Oliver, C. (2016). Network Bricolage as the Reconciliation of Indigenous and Transplanted Institutions in Africa. Africa Journal of Management, 2(3), 300-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2016.1210952
McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.002
Mocellim, A. D. (2010). A comunidade: da sociologia clássica à sociologia contemporânea. Plural, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-8099.pcso.2010.74542
Moraes, N. R., Campos, A. C., Silva, M. L., & Souza, F. C. (2017). Comunidades tradicionais: Cultura e identidade. Revista Observatório, 3(5), 501-522. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2017v3n5p501
Newbert, S. L., & Tornikoski, E. T. (2013). Resource Acquisition in the Emergence Phase: Considering the Effects of Embeddedness and Resource Dependence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 249-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00461.x
Nowak, V., & Raffaelli, P. (2022). The interconnected influences of institutional and social embeddedness on processes of social innovation: A Polanyian perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 34(3-4), 319-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2049376
Oliveira, C. A. F., & Blos, W. S. (2012). Ecoturismo: Desenvolvimento, comunidades tradicionais e participação. Caderno Virtual de Turismo, 12(2), 137-151.
Pahnke, E. C., McDonald, R., Wang, D., & Hallen, B. (2015). Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1334-1360. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0777
Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2014). How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage. Organization Science, 25(6), 1785-1806. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0916
Polanyi, K. (2000). A grande transformação: As origens de nossa época. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Compus.
Redhead, G., & Bika, Z. (2022). ‘Adopting place’: How an entrepreneurial sense of belonging can help revitalise communities. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 34(3-4), 222-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2049375
Reypens, L., Bacq, S., & Milanov, H. (2021). Beyond bricolage: Early-stage technology venture resource mobilization in resource-scarce contexts. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(4), 106110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106110
Roberts, L. (2018). Spatial Bricolage: The Art of Poetically Making Do. Humanities, 7(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/h7020043
Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2013). Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1085-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.005
Scazziota, V., Andreassi, T., Ribeiro Serra, F. A., & Guerrazzi, L. (2020). Expanding knowledge frontiers in entrepreneurship: Examining bricolage and effectuation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 1043-1065. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0638
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12091
Silva, A. T. R. (2019). Protected areas, Amazonian traditional people and new conservationist arrangements. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais, 34(99). https://doi.org/10.1590/349905/2019
Stinchfield, B. T., Nelson, R. E., & Wood, M. S. (2013). Learning From Levi-Strauss’ Legacy: Art, Craft, Engineering, Bricolage, and Brokerage in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(4), 889-921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00523.x
Trettin, L., & Welter, F. (2011). Challenges for spatially oriented entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(7-8), 575-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985621003792988
Urano, D. G., & Nóbrega, W. R. M. (2020). Community-based tourism and networks: An analysis of the collaborative relationships in the Tucum Network, Brazil. PODIUM Sport, Leisure and Tourism Review, 9(3), 408-434. https://doi.org/10.5585/podium.v9i3.15916
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808
Vale, G. M. V., & Corrêa, V. S. (2015). Estrutura social e criação de empresas. Revista de Administração, 50(4), 432-446. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1211
Vestrum, I. (2014). The embedding process of community ventures: creating a music festival in a rural community. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26, 619-644. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.971076
Vial, V., & Hanoteau, J. (2015). Returns to Micro-Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Economy: A Quantile Study of Entrepreneurial Indonesian Households’ Welfare. World Development, 74, 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.04.008
Vieira, V. G., Oliveira, V. M., & Chim-Miki, A. F. (2022). Elementos formadores das dimensões do empreendedorismo social. Iberoamerican Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 11(3), e2097.
Villares-Varela, M., Ram, M., & Jones, T. (2018). Bricolage as Survival, Growth and Transformation: The Role of Patch-Working in the Social Agency of Migrant Entrepreneurs. Work, Employment and Society, 32(5), 942-962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018768203
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing Entrepreneurship — Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
Wigren-Kristoferson, C., Brundin, E., Hellerstedt, K., Stevenson, A., & Aggestam, M. (2022). Rethinking embeddedness: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 34(1-2), 32-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021.2021298
Yachin, J. M., & Ioannides, D. (2020). “Making do” in rural tourism: The resourcing behaviour of tourism micro-firms. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(7), 1003-1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1715993
Yu, X., Li, Y., Su, Z., Tao, Y., Nguyen, B., & Xia, F. (2020). Entrepreneurial bricolage and its effects on new venture growth and adaptiveness in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(4), 1141-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09657-1
Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 32(5), 479-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613519807
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal: only for the 1st publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors, while doing the submission, accept the notice below:
We authors hold the copyright related to our paper and transfer Contextus journal the right for the first publication with a Creative Commons’ international license of the modality Attribution – Non-commercial 4.0, which in turn allows the paper to be shared providing that both the authorship and the journal’s right for initial release are acknowledged.
Furthermore, we are aware of our permission to take part in additional contracts independently for non-exclusive distribution of the version of our work published in this journal (e.g. publishing it in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), while acknowledging both the authorship and the journal’s initial publication.
We also certify that the paper is original and up to this date has not been released in any other journal, Brazilian or of another nationality, either in Portuguese or another language, as well as it has not been sent for simultaneous publication in other journals.
Last, we not only know that plagiarism is not tolerated by Contextus but also certify the paper presents the sources of passages from cited works, including those authored by ourselves.
3.png)
1.jpg)
1.jpg){kind=small}
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
2.png)
1.jpg)
2.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
