Evidências tecnológicas para assistência ambulatorial e domiciliar em urologia pediátrica: revisão de escopo

Samara dos Santos Paiva; Erika Lorena Ramos de Oliveira Silva; Gisele Martins

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20232483089

Authors

Samara dos Santos Paiva Universidade de Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7444-9888
Erika Lorena Ramos de Oliveira Silva Universidade de Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-9943
Gisele Martins Universidade de Brasília https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-6195

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20232483089

Keywords:

Ambulatory Care; Internet-Based Intervention; Urology; Pediatrics; Review.

Abstract

Objective: to map the evidence on web-based technologies and their applicability in outpatient and home care in pediatric urology. Methods: this is a scoping review, with searches conducted in six databases, with no time limit, in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Results: 2,200 articles were obtained, with 19 publications eligible for the final sample. The most used web-based technologies were telehealth and telemedicine (47.3%), online intervention programs (21.0%), and mobile apps (15.8%), with a lower rate of use of serious games, social media, and urination videos (5.3%), mostly in the home setting. Conclusion: the mapping of technological evidence in outpatient and home care in pediatric urology allowed us to identify the types of technology and their applications focused on self-management of symptoms and self-efficacy, for monitoring and follow-up of urologic care. Contributions to practice: the synthesized evidence contributes to an expanded, qualified, and innovative professional practice with the pediatric population with urinary and bowel symptoms, characteristics related to advanced nursing practice, in addition to favoring early diagnosis and greater therapeutic adherence, particularly by supporting interventions tailored to the needs of the pediatric patient and his family.

References

Sheikh A, Anderson M, Albala S, Casadei B, Franklin BD, Richards M, et al. Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. Lancet Digit Health. 2021;3(6):e383-96. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00005-4

Miller A, Rhee E, Gettman M, Spitz A. The current state of telemedicine in urology. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(2):387-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2017.10.014

Castro AR, Chougui K, Bilodeau C, Tsimicalis A. Exploring the views of osteogenesis imperfecta caregivers on internet-based technologies: qualitative descriptive study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(12):e15924. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/15924

Early J, Gonzalez C, Gordon-Dseagu V, Robles-Calderon L. Use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies and interventions among community health workers globally: a scoping review. Health Promot Pract. 2019;20(6):805-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919855391

Moura Júnior LA. A estratégia de saúde digital para o Brasil 2020 - 2028. J Health Inform [Internet]. 2021 [cited Dec 5, 2022];13(1):1-2. Available from: https://jhi.sbis.org.br/index.php/jhi-sbis/article/view/878

Smith E, Cline J, Patel A, Zamilpa I, Canon S. Telemedicine versus traditional for follow-up evaluation of enuresis. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(2):213-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0297

Risling T. Educating the nurses of 2025: technology trends of the next decade. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;22:89-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.12.007

Almohanna AA, Win KT, Meedya S. Effectiveness of internet-based electronic technology interventions on breastfeeding outcomes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e17361. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/17361

Carter B, Whittaker K, Sanders C. Evaluating a telehealth intervention for urinalysis monitoring in children with neurogenic bladder. J Child Health Care. 2019;23(1):45-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493518777294

Chu JTW, Whittaker R, Jiang Y, Wadham A, Stasiak K, Shepherd M, et al. Evaluation of MyTeen – a SMS-based mobile intervention for parents of adolescents: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1203. doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6132-z

Choi EK, Jung E, Ji Y, Bae E. A 2-step integrative education program and mhealth for self-management in Korean children with spina bifida: feasibility study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;49:e54-e62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.09.002

Magee JC, Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, Borowitz SM. Exploring the relationship between parental worry about their children’s health and usage of an internet intervention for pediatric encopresis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(5):530-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn091

Souza BML, Salviano CF, Martins G. Advanced practice nursing in pediatric urology: experience report in the Federal District. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(1):223-7. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0654

Tapiero S, Yoon R, Jefferson F, Sung J, Limfueco L, Cottone C, et al. Smartphone technology and its applications in urology: a review of the literature. World J Urol. 2020;38(10):2393-410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02960-y

Silva RC, Ferreira MA. Tecnologia no cuidado de enfermagem: uma análise a partir do marco conceitual da Enfermagem Fundamental. Rev Bras Enferm. 2014;67(1):111-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7167.20140015

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Chapter 11: scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, JBI, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

Rayyan QCRI. Qatar Computing Research Institute [Internet]. 2022 [cited Dec. 31, 2022]. Available from: https://www.rayyan.ai/

Levy S, Henderson L, McAlpine C. Growing up with confidence: using telehealth to support continence self-care deficits amongst young people with complex needs. Inform Prim Care [Internet]. 2014 [cited Dec 13, 2022]; 21(3):113-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v21i3.58

Modin L, Walsted AM, Rittig CS, Hansen AV, Jakobsen MS. Follow-up in childhood functional constipation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62(4):594-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000974

Myint M, Adam A, Herath S, Smith G. Mobile phone applications in management of enuresis: the good, the bad, and the unreliable! J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(2):112.e1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.09.011

Mozafarpour S, Abbasioun R, Kajbafzadeh AM. The mobile technology era: potential benefits in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;(5):529-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.07.003

Richards D, Caldwell P. Improving health outcomes sooner rather than later via an interactive website and virtual specialist. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018;22(5):1699-706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2017.2782210

Nieuwhof-Leppink AJ, Jong TPVM, Van de Putte EM, Schappin R. Does a serious game increase intrinsic motivation in children receiving urotherapy? J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(1):36.e1-36.e7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.09.003

Van Leuteren PG, Nieuwhof-Leppink AJ, Dik P. SENS-U: clinical evaluation of a full-bladder notification – a pilot study. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(4):381.e1-381.e5. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.04.006

Truong H, Salib A, Rowe CK. The use of social media in pediatric urology-forging new paths or crossing boundaries? Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20(11):72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0928-y

Winkelman AJ, Beller HL, Morgan KE, Corbett ST, Leroy SV, Noona SW, et al. Benefits and barriers to pediatric tele-urology during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(6):840.e1-840.e6. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.09.028

Castaneda P, Ellimoottil C. Current use of telehealth in urology: a review. World J Urol. 2020;38(10):2377-84.doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02882-9

Finkelstein JB, Nelson CP, Estrada CR. Ramping up telemedicine in pediatric urology- tips for using a new modality. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(3):288-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.04.010

Johnson EK, Estrada CR, Johnson KL, Nguyen HT, Rosoklija I, Nelson CP. Evaluation of a mobile voiding diary for pediatric patients with voiding dysfunction: a prospective comparative study. J Urol. 2014;192(3):908-13. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.099

Chrapah S, Becevic M, Washington KT, Sheets LR, Wallach E, Chitima R, et al. Patient and provider satisfaction with pediatric urology telemedicine clinic. J Patient Exp. 2021;8:2374373520975734. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520975734

Gan Z, Lee SY, Weiss DA, Van Batavia J, Siu S, Frazier J, et al. Single institution experience with telemedicine for pediatric urology outpatient visits: adapting to COVID-19 restrictions, patient satisfaction, and future utilization. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(4):480.e1-480.e7. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.05.012

Holzman SA, Davis-Dao CA, Khoury AE, Fortier MA, N Kain Z. Telemedicine and patient satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case-control study of outpatient pediatric urology patients. J Child Health Care. 2021;6:13674935211058272. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13674935211058272

Nieuwhof-Leppink AJ, Hussong J, Chase J, Larsson J, Renson C, Hoebeke P, et al. Definitions, indications and practice of urotherapy in children and adolescents: a standardization document of the International Children’s Continence Society (ICCS). J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(2):172-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.11.006

Virella Pérez YI, Medlow S, Ho J, Steinbeck K. Mobile and web-based apps that support self-management and transition in young people with chronic illness: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(11):e13579. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13579

Otis-Chapados S, Coderre K, Bolduc S, Moore K. Evaluating the distance travelled for urological pediatric appointments. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(12):391-4. doi: http://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5892

Whale K, Beasant L, Wright AJ, Yardley L, Wallace LM, Moody L, et al. A smartphone app for supporting the self-management of daytime urinary incontinence in adolescents: development and formative evaluation study of URApp. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021;4(4):e26212. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/26212

Pettit S, Young E, Jung I. Systematic review of telemedicine in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(1):17-22. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.09.024

Socarrás MR, Loeb S, Teoh JY, Ribal MJ, Bloemberg J, Catto J, et al. Telemedicine and smart working: recommendations of the European Association of Urology. Eur Urol. 2020;78(6):812-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.031

Qiu Y, Coulson S, McIntyre CW, Wile B, Filler G. Adolescent and caregiver attitudes towards telemedicine use in pediatric nephrology. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):537. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06506-0

Vallasciani S, Abdo B, Rauf Z, Anjum A, Ghulman S, Alghammas H, et al. Telehealth for the assessment of patients referred for pediatric urological care: a preliminary cost savings analysis and satisfaction survey. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(8):756-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0159

ElAgami H, Woodward B, Awolaran G, Kalidasan V. Virtual consultation in paediatric urology during the COVID-19 pandemic: The effect of pathology on the outcome. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(7):539-46. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221076967

Kernebeck S, Busse TS, Böttcher MD, Weitz J, Ehlers J, Bork U. Impact of mobile health and medical applications on clinical practice in gastroenterology. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(29):4182-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i29.4182