Uso de profilaxia pós-exposição para o HIV na população jovem: revisão integrativa

Eduardo Rodrigues  Mota; Odaleia de Oliveira Farias; Jéssica Karen de Oliveira Maia; Maisa Leitão de Queiroz; Nikaelly Pinheiro Mota; Marli Teresinha Gimeniz Galvão

doi:10.15253/2175-6783.20222378152

Authors

Eduardo Rodrigues Mota Universidade Federal do Ceará https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-5888
Odaleia de Oliveira Farias Universidade Federal do Ceará https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3700-1192
Jéssica Karen de Oliveira Maia Universidade Federal do Ceará https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9041-7149
Maisa Leitão de Queiroz Centro Universitário Ateneu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-3402
Nikaelly Pinheiro Mota Universidade Federal do Ceará https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5224-446X
Marli Teresinha Gimeniz Galvão Universidade Federal do Ceará https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-9107

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222378152

Keywords:

Health Education; HIV; HIV Infections; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Technology.

Abstract

Objective: to identify the use of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in young people in the context of sexual risk behavior. Methods: this is an integrative review, with search in LILACS, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, SciELO and COCHRANE, using the main descriptors: HIV, HIV Infections, Health Education, Technology and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis related through the Boolean operators AND and OR. Results: the final sample included 16 studies, mostly implemented with men who have sex with men. The articles were classified and analyzed from the categories: knowledge assessment; barriers/challenges to adherence to post-exposure prophylaxis; population using post-exposure prophylaxis; and educational technologies. Conclusion: non-adherence was related to the ignorance of basic information such as the indication of post-exposure prophylaxis, place of delivery, dosage, and side effects. Contributions to practice: synthesis of knowledge about the use of post-exposure prophylaxis by young people. In addition to increasing research on young people in the context of risky sexual behavior, especially in the nursing field, it subsidizes the development of health education strategies.

References

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Boletim Epidemiológico de HIV e Aids [Internet]. 2020 [cited Jan. 10, 2022]. Available from: http://www.aids.gov.br/pt-br/pub/2020/boletim-epidemiologico-hivaids-2020

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund - UNICEF. Adolescent HIV prevention [Internet]. 2021 [cited Apr. 11, 2022]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/hivaids/adolescents-young-people/

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Prevenção combinada do HIV: bases conceituais para profissionais, trabalhadores (as) e gestores (as) de saúde [Internet]. 2017 [cited Apr. 11, 2022]. Available from: http://www.aids.gov.br/pt-br/pub/2017/prevencao-combinada-do-hiv-bases-conceituais-para-profissionais-trabalhadoresas-e-gestores

Lima MS, Raniere JC, Paes CJO, Gonçalves LHT, Cunha CLF, Ferreira GRON, et al. The association between knowledge about HIV and risk factors in young Amazon people. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(5):e20190453. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0453

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Departamento de vigilância, controle e prevenção de infecções. Protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas para manejo da infecção pelo HIV em adultos. [Internet]. 2018 [cited Apr. 11, 2022]. Available from: http://www.aids.gov.br/pt-br/pub/2013/protocolo-clinico-e-diretrizes-terapeuticas-para-manejo-da-infeccao-pelo-hiv-em-adultos

Mendes KDS, Silveira RCDCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008;17(4):758-64. doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072008000400018

World Health Organization. Adolescent health: Adolescent health in the South-East Asia Region [Internet]. 2019 [cited Apr. 11, 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/southeastasia/health-topics/adolescent-health

Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Stillwell S, Williamson K. Evidence-based practice: step by step: the seven steps of evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(1):51-3. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000366056.06605.d2

Tumarkin E, Heendeniya A, Murphy P, Placido T, Tan DHS, Bogoch II. Brief report: HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis-in-Pocket (“PIP”) for individuals with low-frequency, high-risk HIV exposures. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;78(1):20-2. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001639

Hou J, Wu Y, Xie L, Meng S, Fu R, Zheng H, et al. Post-exposure prophylaxis: an underutilized biomedical HIV prevention method among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in China. AIDS Care. 2020;32(12):1573-80. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2020.1742864

Koblin BA, Usher D, Nandi V, Tieu HV, Bravo E, Lucy D, et al. Post-exposure prophylaxis awareness, knowledge, access and use among three populations in New York City, 2016–17. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(8):2718-32. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2175-5

Grangeiro A, Nascimento MMP, Zucchi EM, Ferraz D, Escuder MM, Arruda E, et al. Nonoccupational post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV after sexual intercourse among women in Brazil: risk profiles and predictors of loss to follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(39):e17071. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017071

Palich R, Martin-Blondel G, Cuzin L, Le Talec JY, Boyer P, Massip P, et al. Experiences of HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) among highly exposed men who have sex with men (MSM). Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(7):493-8. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2016-052901

Körner H, Hendry O, Kippax S. Safe sex after post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: intentions, challenges and ambivalences in narratives of gay men. AIDS Care. 2006;18(8):879-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120500307909

Goedel WC, Hagen D, Halkitis PN, Greene RE, Griffin-Tomas M, Brooks FA, et al. Post-exposure prophylaxis awareness and use among men who have sex with men in London who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications. AIDS Care. 2017;29(5):579-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1259455

Hugo JM, Stall RD, Rebe K, Egan JE, Jobson G, Swardt G, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding post exposure prophylaxis among South African men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(Suppl 3):350-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1520-9

Shahmoradi L, Safadari R, Jimma W. Knowledge management implementation and the tools utilized in healthcare for evidence-based decision making: a systematic review. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017;27(5):541-58. doi: http://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v27i5.13

Fernández‐Balbuena S, Belza MJ, Castilla J, Hoyos J, Rosales‐Statkus ME, Sánchez R, et al. Awareness and use of nonoccupational HIV post‐exposure prophylaxis among people receiving rapid HIV testing in Spain. HIV Med. 2013;14(4):252-7. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2012.01056.x

Isano S, Wong R, Logan J, El-Halabi, S, El-Khatib Z. Barriers to post exposure prophylaxis use among men who have sex with men in sub-Saharan Africa: an online cross-sectional survey. Prev Med Rep. 2020;19(1):e101100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101100

Gupta N, Schmidt H, Buisker T, Dufour MSK, Goldenson J, Myers J, et al. After the fact: a brief educational program on HIV postexposure prophylaxis for female detainees in a local jail. J Correct Health Care. 2015;21(2):140-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078345815572335

Oldenburg CE, Bärnighausen T, Harling G, Mimiaga MJ, Mayer KH. Adherence to post-exposure prophylaxis for non-forcible sexual exposure to HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):217-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0567-0

Dodds C. Positive benefits: preventive impact of post-exposure prophylaxis awareness among those with diagnosed HIV. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(2):92-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2007.026211

Kalichman S. Post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection in gay and bisexual men: implications for the future of HIV prevention. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15(2):120-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00037-3

Lewis CF, Lekas HM, Rivera A, Williams SZ, Crawford ND, Pérez-Figueroa RE, et al. Pharmacy PEP access intervention among persons who use drugs in New York city: iPEPcare study-rethinking biomedical HIV prevention strategies. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(7):2101-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02775-3

Moraes DCDA, Oliveira RCD, Prado AVAD, Cabral JDR, Corrêa CA, Albuquerque MMBD. Knowledge of people living with HIV/Aids about antiretroviral therapy Enferm Glob. 2017;17(49):96-141. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.17.1.274001

Tshering K, Wangchuk K, Letho Z. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice of post exposure prophylaxis for HIV among nurses at Jigme Dorji Wanghuck National Referral Hospital, Bhutan. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0238069. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238069

Charpentier N, Quatremère G, Mabire X, Roduit S, Laguette V, Spittler D, et al. Freins et leviers de la prise en charge du traitement post-exposition au VIH. Santé Publique [Internet]. 2016 [cited Jan. 13, 2022];28(6):791-9. Available from: https://www.cairn.info/revue-sante-publique-2016-6-page-791.htm

Hakim AJ, Callahan T, Benech I, Patel M, Adler M, Modi S, et al. Addressing vulnerable population needs in the last mile to the elimination of mother to child transmission of HIV: (Re) claiming the HIV response for female sex workers and their children. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09114-5